The Maze Runner

Reading James Dashner’s best-selling young adult novel The Maze Runner, I wasn’t particularly impressed. That said, this is one of those rare times when you read a book, and though you don’t think much of the work as it is, you think to yourself that this might make a decent movie. Sure, the writing may be lackluster—just because it’s for a younger audience doesn’t mean you should be able to get away with subpar writing, but that’s a discussion for another time and place—and the characters are so-so, but there a number of elements that could translate well from the page to the screen.
Structurally, the book is sound. From the get go, the pace is brisk, and there’s not a ton of down time to dwell on any issues. There’s a unique set up and hook, a constant earnest tension placed on the characters, and ample opportunities for big action set pieces that could very well work like gangbusters on the big screen. And did I mention there are big ass monsters with a sinister name? Because there are.
While there’s potential here for a good movie, the question remains, do first-time feature director Wes Ball and company capitalize on that? While this won’t necessarily blow you away or seem totally unfamiliar (especially if you’ve seen Cube), the answer is yes. The Maze Runner is a pleasing entry into the lucrative teen dystopia market that, while not quite as strong as The Hunger Games (especially Catching Fire), is a damn sight better than Divergent.
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
-     
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 