Pattern Recognition: Jim Jarmusch, Paterson and The Limits of Control

Throughout his career, Jim Jarmusch has cultivated a reputation for, among other things, exploring the lives of outsiders, whether they be New York hipsters (Stranger than Paradise); strangers in strange lands (Down by Law, Mystery Train); an accountant named William Blake who may be a reincarnation of the poet of the same name (Dead Man); a hitman who abides by a samurai code (Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai); or a pair of holier-than-thou vampires (Only Lovers Left Alive). By comparison, there’s little that’s outwardly eccentric about the eponymous main character of Jarmusch’s latest film, Paterson. Paterson (Adam Driver) is a bus driver residing with his wife, Laura (Golshifteh Farahani), in the northern New Jersey city of Paterson, where he lives a seemingly humdrum life of routine: riding the same NJ Transit bus on the same schedule Monday through Friday, walking Laura’s dog Marvin every night and leaving him tied up outside as he grabs a beer at the same local pub. Only one thing distinguishes him, but it’s crucial: his love of poetry—not just reading it, but writing it, scribbling down ideas for potential poems in a notebook whenever he has a free moment.
With maybe the exception of the aging, rueful Don Juan Bill Murray played in Broken Flowers, Paterson is the closest Jarmusch has come to examining the life of an utterly ordinary man, and thereby, by extension, addressing everyday life as you and I experience it. In that sense, Paterson could be seen as possibly Jarmusch’s most focused statement of philosophical intent. Here, in this gentle, repetitively structured chronicle of a week in the life of this fairly nondescript human being, is the auteur’s view of life as it ought to be lived: one in which art becomes a way to fill one’s soul, adding color and meaning to one’s existence.
But this isn’t the first time that Jarmusch has posited this view of life and art’s role in it. In some ways, the seeds of Paterson can be seen in a film that, to this day, is still generally—and, to my mind, unjustifiably—considered possibly his weakest: his 2008 film The Limits of Control.
It’s easy to see why many critics and audience members were turned off by The Limits of Control at the time. Though Jarmusch once again drew on a classic genre—the existential hitman film, exemplified by Jean-Pierre Melville’s Le Samouraï and John Boorman’s Point Blank—this time he didn’t even bother to create dimensional characters. All of the supporting players revolving around the stoic and laconic Lone Man (Isaach de Bankolé) are little more than mouthpieces for various artistic/philosophical positions, all of them strung together with the barest of plots, which has something to do with a hit whose endgame isn’t even fully revealed until the very end. With Jarmusch showing no interest in giving audiences even a hint of conventional genre excitement, The Limits of Control understandably jarred most viewers with what, for all the exotic Spanish settings and colorful costumes, is an unapologetically academic work.